Restorative Conversations: Repairing Relationships After Classroom Conflict
How to lead short restorative conversations after conflict or harm, with question scripts, a planning checklist and guidance on when not to use them.
During a group project, Sofia makes a comment about Daniel's work that the whole group hears. Daniel shoves his chair back, says something angry and refuses to work with the group for the rest of the period. The next morning, the two are seated near each other again, and the tension is obvious to everyone.
A consequence alone might stop the behavior for now, but it doesn't address what happened between Sofia and Daniel, or how the group will work together tomorrow. That's the gap restorative conversations aim to fill.
This article explains what restorative practices are, how to lead short restorative conversations in the classroom, and how to prepare students for them. It includes question scripts, a planning checklist and guidance on when a restorative conversation is not the right tool.
Understanding restorative practices
What restorative practices are
Restorative practices are approaches that focus on building community, understanding the effects of behavior on others, and repairing harm. Rather than asking only "What rule was broken and what consequence follows?", a restorative approach also asks "Who was affected, and what needs to happen to make things right?"
In schools, restorative practices usually include both proactive elements (community-building circles, relationship-building) and responsive elements (conversations or conferences after conflict). The International Institute for Restorative Practices (IIRP) is one well-known source of training and frameworks.
Restorative questions
Many restorative approaches use a set of standard questions, such as:
- What happened?
- What were you thinking at the time?
- What have you thought about since?
- Who has been affected by what you did, and in what way?
- What do you think you need to do to make things right?
And for the person who was harmed:
- What did you think when you realized what had happened?
- What impact has this had on you and others?
- What has been the hardest thing for you?
- What do you think needs to happen to make things right?
These questions (adapted from widely used restorative frameworks) are designed to be non-blaming and to help students reflect.
What research generally suggests
Interest in restorative practices in U.S. schools has grown, partly as an alternative to exclusionary discipline. Research findings are mixed and still developing; outcomes appear to depend heavily on how well and how consistently practices are implemented. Restorative practices tend to be described as most effective when they are part of a broader, school-supported approach, not a one-off script.
Why it matters
- It teaches empathy and responsibility. Students consider how their actions affect others.
- It repairs relationships, so students can learn together again.
- It keeps students in the learning community, rather than relying only on removal.
- It gives harmed students a voice, which traditional consequences often don't.
- It builds problem-solving skills students can use on their own later.
Practical strategies
1. Build community first
What to do: Use proactive practices, such as community circles or regular class meetings, before you need responsive ones.
Why it helps: Repair depends on relationships. Students who have practiced listening and sharing in low-stakes circles are better prepared for harder conversations.
How to implement: Hold a short circle weekly with a light prompt ("What's something you're looking forward to?"). Use a talking piece and teach circle norms: one voice, listen to understand, the right to pass.
2. Use affective statements
What to do: Share how a behavior affected you, using "I" statements.
Why it helps: Affective statements model emotional language and help students see the human effect of their actions without shaming.
How to implement: "I felt frustrated when the group discussion was interrupted, because I want everyone to be heard." Keep your tone calm and the focus on the behavior, not the student's character.
3. Hold brief restorative check-ins
What to do: For minor conflicts, use a quick conversation with a few restorative questions.
Why it helps: Most conflicts don't need a formal conference. A two- to five-minute conversation often resolves them.
How to implement: Choose a private moment when the students are calm. Ask "What happened?", "Who was affected?" and "What can you do to make it right?" Agree on one concrete action.
4. Lead a facilitated restorative conversation
What to do: For more significant conflicts, bring together the students involved for a structured conversation.
Why it helps: A facilitated conversation gives each person a chance to be heard and to agree on how to move forward.
How to implement: Meet with each student separately first to make sure they are willing and calm. During the conversation, set norms, ask each student the restorative questions in turn, and help them agree on a plan. Follow up a few days later.
5. Make repair meaningful
What to do: Help students choose actions that address the actual harm.
Why it helps: A forced apology often means little. Repair that connects to the harm teaches responsibility.
How to implement: Repair might be a sincere apology, helping clean up, fixing something, rewriting comments, or agreeing on how to work together next time. Let the harmed student have input into what feels right.
6. Combine restorative and other responses when needed
What to do: Use restorative conversations alongside school procedures, not as a replacement for them.
Why it helps: Some situations require administrative involvement, safety planning or other responses. Repair can still be part of the process.
How to implement: Follow your school's discipline policy and consult administrators and counselors. A restorative conversation might happen after other steps are complete.
When a restorative conversation is not the right tool
- When either student is not calm or not willing to participate.
- When there is a significant power imbalance, such as bullying, harassment or intimidation. Bringing students together face to face can cause further harm; follow your school's bullying and harassment procedures and involve the counselor or administrator.
- When safety is at risk, or there are concerns about abuse, threats or self-harm. Follow mandatory reporting and safety procedures immediately.
- When the harmed student doesn't want to meet. Their choice should be respected; other forms of repair may still be possible.
Step-by-step implementation
- Learn your school's approach. Find out whether your school uses restorative practices and what training or guidance is available.
- Build community through regular circles or class meetings.
- Teach the language of feelings, effects and repair during calm times.
- Start with affective statements and brief check-ins for minor conflicts.
- Prepare carefully before a facilitated conversation, meeting with each student first.
- Facilitate using restorative questions, with clear norms.
- Agree on repair and write it down if helpful.
- Follow up a few days later to check whether the agreement is working.
- Reflect on what worked and seek support for harder cases.
Tool: Restorative conversation checklist
| Before | During | After |
|---|---|---|
| Both students are calm and willing | Set norms: one voice, respect, honesty | Write down the agreement |
| No power imbalance or safety concern | Ask each student the restorative questions | Check in after a few days |
| Met with each student separately | Listen and summarize without judging | Acknowledge progress |
| Private, quiet location chosen | Help students agree on repair | Involve the counselor if needed |
| Time set aside (not rushed) | End on a forward-looking note | Reflect on what you'd adjust |
Sample script: brief restorative check-in
"Thanks for meeting with me. I want to understand what happened in your group yesterday. Sofia, can you tell me what happened from your side? ... Daniel, what about you? ... Sofia, how do you think Daniel felt when he heard that comment? ... Daniel, what was the hardest part for you? ... What do you both think would help your group work well tomorrow? ... Okay, so Sofia will talk to Daniel about it in her own words, and you'll both use the group roles. Let's check in on Friday."
Illustrative scenarios
These are invented examples.
Second grade: a broken tower
During centers, Eli knocks down a block tower Mia spent ten minutes building. The teacher waits until both are calm, then asks Eli, "What happened?" and "How do you think Mia feels?" Mia shares that she's sad. Eli offers to help rebuild it, and Mia agrees. They finish it together.
Eighth grade: a group project conflict
After Sofia's comment about Daniel's work, the teacher meets with each student separately. Both are willing to talk. In the conversation, Sofia hears how the comment embarrassed Daniel, and Daniel explains that he felt the group didn't value his ideas. They agree on group roles and a way to give feedback. The teacher checks in two days later.
High school: a teacher-student repair
Mr. Brooks responds sharply to a student's comment and the student walks out. The next day, he asks to talk. "I want to talk about yesterday. I spoke to you in a way I'm not proud of. What was going on for you?" The student shares that they'd had a hard morning. They agree on a signal the student can use when they need a minute.
Differentiation and adaptations
- Early elementary: Use simpler questions ("What happened? How do they feel? How can we fix it?"), picture-based feeling charts and short conversations.
- Upper elementary: Students can practice restorative questions in role-play and can begin leading circles with support.
- Secondary: Respect privacy and autonomy. Adolescents may be more willing to participate when they see the process as fair and not performative.
- Students with disabilities: Adapt questions for students' communication and processing needs. Use visuals, allow processing time, accept alternative ways of responding and follow the student's IEP or behavior plan. Ask the special education team for guidance.
- English learners: Offer sentence frames and feeling vocabulary, allow responses in the home language when a trusted interpreter is available, and keep language simple.
- Cultural responsiveness: Norms around conflict, apology and eye contact vary. Focus on understanding and repair rather than a particular form of apology.
Common challenges and solutions
- "There's no time." Start with brief check-ins and affective statements. Longer conversations can happen at lunch or before school.
- "Students just say what I want to hear." Model honesty, ask follow-up questions, and focus on concrete actions rather than words.
- "It feels like no consequence." Repair is a form of accountability. Where policy requires additional responses, use both.
- "A student refuses." Don't force participation. Try again later or use a different form of repair.
- "I'm not trained." Ask your school about professional development and lean on counselors for more serious situations.
Key takeaways
- Restorative practices focus on understanding harm and repairing relationships.
- Build community first; repair depends on relationships.
- Use affective statements and brief check-ins for everyday conflicts.
- Prepare carefully for facilitated conversations, and know when not to use them.
- Follow school procedures, especially in situations involving bullying or safety.
Next step: Start a weekly community circle and try one affective statement this week. Explore more in Classroom Management, including building positive teacher–student relationships.
This article offers general classroom guidance. It does not replace your school's policies, a student's IEP or 504 plan, or advice from your school's specialists.
Sources & Further Reading
- International Institute for Restorative Practices (IIRP). https://www.iirp.edu/. Accessed November 2026.
- CASEL, Social and emotional learning resources. https://casel.org/. Accessed November 2026.
- U.S. Department of Education, Guiding Principles: A Resource Guide for Improving School Climate and Discipline (2014). Accessed November 2026.
- Edutopia, Restorative practices articles. https://www.edutopia.org/. Accessed November 2026.
Explore related resources
Teacher-created resources from the Teach This Way! marketplace.
Browse related resources →